The military has encroached on CISA’s jurisdiction out of frustration with the agency’s limited resources, according to Montgomery, a retired Navy rear admiral.
Montgomery explains that the Department of Defense feels compelled to take on tasks that should fall under CISA’s purview, leading to a creeping boundary expansion to secure critical infrastructure like power grids and telecom systems near military bases in times of crisis.
Department of Dubious Moves
One of the most daring proposals in Project 2025’s plan involves relocating CISA to the Department of Transportation as part of a broader agenda to dismantle DHS.
While some conservatives support this move to streamline government operations, Brandon Pugh from the R Street Institute suggests that critics believe CISA has overstepped its original mandate and become too unwieldy.
However, the proposal faces significant opposition from congressional committees overseeing CISA, making it unlikely to gain traction. Moreover, transferring CISA to a department with a different mission would likely hinder its effectiveness and disrupt the agency’s cybersecurity efforts.
Squandering a Moment
Despite some shortcomings in Project 2025’s understanding of CISA’s role, the document fails to offer meaningful reform recommendations.
Experts suggest that there is a pressing need for improved coordination on cyber issues within the government, questioning the current leadership structure’s efficacy.
Montgomery criticizes Project 2025 for its lack of comprehension of federal government operations, describing it as a document filled with “little tantrums.”
Costello expresses concern over the potential negative impact of implementing Project 2025’s proposals, particularly the risk of diminishing CISA’s importance, morale, and funding.